Second Rule Book Draft
We are excited to release an updated draft of the IJRU Judges and Competition Manuals. Over the past 2 months the Technical Congress has continued to develop the rules and discuss the feedback we received on our first draft.
Once again we are interested in your feedback, please read through the documents and fill out the survey at the end of this post when you are finished.
If you have not had an opportunity to read our earlier blog posts, they may be helpful in understanding these rules and how they were developed. Most of the difficult decisions in developing these rules are discussed there.
Many people have voiced concerns that our rules are too different from the previous organizations. At a foundational level we do not believe that the IJRU rules are drastically different from the rules of either previous organization. At the end of the day we are still evaluating routines for the difficulty level of each skill and how well the athlete performs those skills. To help illustrate the similarities between the systems we have created the following chart:
IJRU | WJRF | FISAC-IRSF |
---|---|---|
Required Elements/Deducion Judge
|
Head Judge
|
Required Elements Judge, 10% of the score
|
Presentation Judge, % of the score TBD
|
Presentation Judge, 40% of the score
|
Presentation Judge, 40% of the score
|
Difficulty Judge
|
Content Judge, 60% of the score
|
Difficulty Judge, 50% of the score
|
Head Judge
|
Survey doesn’t load? Click here